Karl Bode at Broadband Reports broke the news this morning (now confirmed) that Comcast will institute a 250GB bandwidth cap starting on October 1st. Nobody likes a cap, but as far as they go, this one’s pretty generous. It’s also far from unprecedented. Time Warner Cable made a lot of (negative) news when it started trialing a 40GB cap earlier in the year. But some of the smaller cable operators have been capping or metering for years. CableOne, for example, limits downloads and uploads during the time period between Noon and Midnight. The base plan allows for 1.3GB downstream and 131MB upstream in a day, and if you exceed those caps, the operator will slow down your connection. Meanwhile Sunflower Broadband appears to offer only 1GB downstream per month in its base plan. On the other hand, you can add extra gigabytes for only a dollar each in advance or the operator will charge you two dollars after the fact.
The one bit of good news around the fact that the big cablecos are getting into the capping game is that at least now we’re having a discussion about what’s reasonable. For example, should network management include caps, or slowed access for heavy users during peak times, or both? (I know “neither” is the ideal answer, but it’s also impractical.)
And, how much bandwidth is really enough? Keep in mind that the operators themselves don’t want to limit bandwidth too much because of the revenue potential from new services. As more IP devices hit the market, there are more opportunities for cable companies to sell broadband apps and even hardware/software bundles. Limitations on consumers are also limitations on cable revenue.
Which brings us around to the most important point. Capping and metering do not increase bandwidth capacity. Even as they set management policies for Internet use, operators still have to work continually to increase overall bandwidth availability. Good for the consumer, good for the cable company. Hell, it’s good for the country too.
Now one little extra tidbit. It turns out, unsurprisingly, that bandwidth management is more important in some places than in others. Apparently network management technology gets turned off by accident on occasion, and in one instance I heard about just this week, a not-to-be-named operator had network management accidentally turned off for two weeks before anybody noticed! I’m thinking the operator is probably not based in a college town.
Comments
Tsk... tsk... tsk...
Tsk... tsk... tsk...
I think this is thinly veiled guise to abuse their monopoly in distribution to keep their monopoly in entertainment. They don't want indy stuff going over their pipes.
They want your eyes on their stuff and to sell your eyes to their advertisers. This is the "good ol' boys" club and they don't want it ANY other way.
Yes, there are a few that need reigned in... but not every MP3 or movie is pirated.. I use torrents to share indy films, family movies, pictures and the rare TV program that I record for a family member or friend. (Fair use - this is no different than putting it on VHS and sending it to them).
While 250 gig sounds "reasonable"... unattended machines with viruses or trojans could EASILY spawn bills in the hundreds of dollars. Especially in homes with multiple teens who are easily lured by promises of free music and ringtones.
My cable bill jumps to $165/month this month... which is more than my heating, electricity, water and sanitation COMBINED. I feel for that kind of dough, I'm entitled to more than the 150 channels of crap they want to cram down my throat.
So - I'm just itching for any excuse to turn cable off... and a cap would definitely do it.