I just got off a plane in Minneapolis and will be tied up most of the day, but just learned that the US Court of Appeals has rendered their decision (based on testimony I sat in on). I haven’t had a chance to peruse the document, but here’s a cut & paste of the conclusion:
In sum, because of a failure of proof of literal infringement, we reverse the
judgment of infringement of the hardware claims with respect to all of the accused devices. We remand for any further proceedings that may be necessary with respect to those claims. We affirm the judgment of infringement of the software claims with respect to all of the accused devices. Because the damages calculation at trial was not predicated on the infringement of particular claims, and because we have upheld the jury?s verdict that all of the accused devices infringe the software claims, we affirm the damages award entered by the district court.
The district court?s injunction was stayed during the course of these proceedings. The stay that was issued pending appeal will dissolve when this appeal becomes final. At that time, the district court can make a determination as to the additional damages, if any, that TiVo has sustained while the stay of the permanent injunction has been in effect.
(Thanks for the tip and link, Jason D!)
